Sometimes the language we use every day, often unthinkingly, contains within it traces of a much older wisdom. Consider the phrases “I’ve changed my mind” and “I’ve had a change of heart”.The first thing to notice is activity described by the verbs: one is something that we do — as the result of learning new information, or having experiences that alter our values or view of the world; the other is something we undergo, something that happens to us — we see something we couldn’t see before (as though the light shines differently upon it, as Wittgenstein would say), or the same person or phenomenon evokes a different feeling from us.Perhaps it’s accurate to say that changing one’s mind is like taking a different path or going in a different direction, whereas having a change of heart is more like changing one’s compass bearings. But does that mean we are simply passive when it comes to such a reorientation of heart?In this Ramadan series, we are examining what we’re calling the cardiocentrism of the moral life — which is to say, the vital importance of cultivating the inner disposition of what we most often call “the heart”: the faculty which stands for both our inner-most selves, and that which makes us receptive to moral realities or truths outside of ourselves.The heart can act as a kind of moral compass which responds to moral realities we’d prefer to evade or avoid. Consider the pivotal moment in J M Coetzee’s novel <a href="https://www.textpublishing.com.au/books/elizabeth-costello">Elizabeth Costello</a>, when the eponymous character responds to demands for reasons or “principles” that would ground her horror in response to the mass killing of animals for food: “I was hoping not to have to enunciate principles”, she says. “If principles are what you want … I would have to respond, open your heart and listen to what your heart says.”So perhaps we can’t change our hearts, but does this suggest it is incumbent on us to maintain a certain “openness” or sustained “exposure” to moral realities we’d rather ignore — and that such openness is a precondition for undergoing a change of heart?Guest: <a href="https://clairezorn.com/">Claire Zorn</a> is the multi-award-winning author of five novels and the author/illustrator of two picture books. Her most recent book is <a href="https://www.allenandunwin.com/browse/book/Claire-Zorn-Better-Days-9781922928078">Better Days</a>.—UPCOMING LIVE RECORDING<ul><li>When: Tuesday, 10 March 2026, from 1:45 pm to 3 pm</li><li>Where: Customs House, The Long Room, Brisbane City, QLD</li></ul>“The Aesthetics of Power: Why Authoritarianism Needs Spectacle”As democratic norms erode around the world, the performance of political power has become increasingly theatrical. From militarised displays to orchestrated media moments, authoritarian movements rely on spectacle to project stability, legitimacy and inevitability.In partnership with the Brisbane Writers Festival and as part of the University of Queensland’s <a href="https://about.uq.edu.au/strategy-values/other-initiatives/campus-culture/campus-culture-speaker-series">Dialogues Across Difference series</a>, this special live recording of ABC Radio National’s The Minefield brings together acclaimed journalist and New York Times columnist M Gessen with co‑hosts Waleed Aly and Scott Stephens. Together, they will explore why modern authoritarianism depends on spectacle — and how aesthetics shape the public imagination and the conditions of democratic life.Attendance is free, but <a href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-aesthetics-of-power-why-authoritarianism-needs-spectacle-tickets-1982735962638?aff=oddtdtcreator">registration on Eventbrite is essential</a>.

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

Ramadan: Having a ‘Change of Heart’ — with Claire Zorn

The Minefield

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews