Since well before the big bang, people have been bitching about Tamler's chosen field. We talk about Bernard Williams' (qualified) defense of analytic philosophy in his essay "On Hating and Despising Philosophy." We also dig into Lily Hu's review of a recent book by Christoph Schuringa, an ideological and historical critique of the philosophical tendency to think they engage in an unbiased perspective-free search for truth. Plus - is it unethical for philosophers and other academics to make money on Substack? <a href= "https://walterveit.substack.com/p/is-it-unethical-for-academics-to"> Is it unethical for academics to monetize Substack? by Walter Veit</a> [substack.com] <a href= "https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v18/n08/bernard-williams/on-hating-and-despising-philosophy"> On Hating and Despising Philosophy by Bernard Williams</a> [lb.co.uk] <a href= "https://academic.oup.com/mind/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/mind/fzag030/8765469?login=false"> Review of A Social History of Analytic Philosophy: How Politics Has Shaped an Apolitical Philosophy by Lily Hu</a> [academic.oup.com]

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

Episode 339: Is Analytic Philosophy Truthmaxxing?

Very Bad Wizards

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews