In some policy circles, the idea of the U.S. electing a CEO-style dictator running the country like a company is gaining momentum. But should the idea be embraced? Those proposing the Dictator CEO, like Curtis Yarvin, argue it would challenge existing institutions and deliver cutthroat efficiency. But democracy advocates, like E. Glen Weyl, argue that consolidating power under one leader undermines the core values fundamental to America’s political system. Now we debate: Should the U.S. Be Ruled by a CEO Dictator? 

Arguing Yes: Curtis Yarvin, Anti-democracy theorist and Tech Entrepreneur 
Arguing No: E. Glen Weyl, Co-Founder of the RadicalxChange Foundation, Plurality Institute, and the Faith, Family and Technology Network 

Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates 

Visit <a href="https://opentodebate.org/">OpentoDebate.org</a> to watch more insightful debates.  
Subscribe to our <a href="https://opentodebate.org/newsletter/">newsletter</a> to stay informed on our curated weekly debates, dynamic live events, and educational initiatives.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices">podcastchoices.com/adchoices</a>

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

Should the U.S. Be Ruled by a CEO Dictator?

Open to Debate

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews