<a href="https://www.patreon.com/braininspired">Support the show</a> to get full episodes, full archive, and join the Discord community.



<a href="https://www.patreon.com/braininspired"></a>





The Transmitter is an online publication that aims to deliver useful information, insights and tools to build bridges across neuroscience and advance research. Visit thetransmitter.org to explore the latest neuroscience news and perspectives, written by journalists and scientists.



Read more about <a href="https://www.thetransmitter.org/partners/">our partnership</a>.



Sign up for <a href="https://www.thetransmitter.org/newsletters/">Brain Inspired email alerts</a> to be notified every time a new Brain Inspired episode is released.



To explore more neuroscience news and perspectives, visit <a href="http://thetransmitter.org">thetransmitter.org</a>.





My guest today is Dan Nicholson, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at George Mason University, here to talk about his little book, <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/what-is-life-revisited/E6B3EA136720CF50C9480ADB8F41A6F4">What Is Life? Revisited</a>. Erwin Schrödinger's What Is Life is a famous book that people point to as having predicted DNA and influenced and inspired many well-known biologists ushering in the molecular biology revolution. But Schrödinger was a physicist, not a biologist, and he spent very little time and effort toward understanding biology.



What was he up to, why did he write this "famous little book"? Schrödinger had an agenda, a physics agenda. He wanted to save the older deterministic version of quantum physics from the new indeterministic version. When Dan was on the podcast a few years ago, we talked about the machine view of biological systems, how everything has become a "mechanism", and how that view fails to capture what modern science is actually telling us, that organisms are unlike machines in important ways. That work of Dan's led him down this path to Schrödinger's What Is Life, which he argues was a major contributor to that machine metaphor so ubiquitous today in biology. One of the reasons I'm interested in this kind of work is because the cognitive sciences, including neuroscience and artificial intelligence, inherited this mechanistic perspective, and swallowed it so hard that if you don't include the word "mechanism" in your research paper, you're vastly decreasing your chances of getting your work published, when in fact the mechanistic perspective is one super useful perspective among many.



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://philosophy.gmu.edu/people/dnicho">Dan’s website</a>. <a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=5gxpRPYAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate">Google Scholar</a>.</li>



<li>Social: <a href="https://twitter.com/NicholsonHPBio">@NicholsonHPBio</a></li>



<li><a href="https://amzn.to/47ADp4Y" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">What Is Life? Revisited</a></li>



<li>Previous episode:
<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://braininspired.co/podcast/150/">BI 150 Dan Nicholson: Machines, Organisms, Processes</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>



0:00 - Intro
7:27 - Why Schrodinger wrote What is Life
15:13 - Aperiodic crystal and the meaning of code
21:39 - Order-from-order, order-from-disorder
28:32 - Appeal to authority
37:48 - Cell as machine
39:33 - Relation between DNA and organism (development)
44:44 - Negentropy
53:54 - Original contributions
58:54 - Mechanistic metaphor in neuroscience
1:16:05 - What's the lesson?
1:28:06 - Historical sleuthing
1:39:49 - Modern philosophy of biology

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

BI 224 Dan Nicholson: Schrödinger’s What is Life? Revisited

Brain Inspired

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews