<h2>00:46 Martian ‘micro-lightning’</h2>The sounds of ‘micro-lightning’ have been recorded by NASA’s Perseverance rover, ending a long search for the phenomenon on Mars. A lack of suitable equipment has made it difficult to gather evidence of lightning on the red planet, but a team of researchers realized that a microphone on Perseverance should be able to pick up the characteristic sounds of electrical discharges. In total they found 55 such examples, along with signs of electrostatic interference indicative of the phenomenon. They dubbed the electric bursts ‘micro-lightning’, as they are far smaller than the lighting seen on Earth, due to the thin Martian atmosphere. The team believe this finding could help better understand Martian chemistry and how best to design equipment to explore the planet’s surface.Research Article:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09736-y" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Chide et al.</a>News and Views:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03590-8" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Is there lightning on Mars?</a><h2>11:03 Research Highlights</h2>How the biology of male seahorses’ brood pouches appears similar to mammalian pregnancy— plus, why Neanderthals’ jaws were so beefy.Research Highlight:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03696-z" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The origin of male seahorses’ brood pouch</a>Research Highlight:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03697-y" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Neanderthal DNA reveals how human faces form</a><h2>13:36 The key takeaways from COP30</h2>The UN’s climate conference, COP30, came to a close last week in Brazil.&nbsp;Nature&nbsp;reporter Jeff Tollefson tells us what was and wasn’t agreed during the final negotiations.Nature:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03802-1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">What happened at COP30? 4 science take-homes from the climate summit</a><h2>22:27 Why women may retract less than men</h2>A new analysis suggests that female authors retract fewer medical science papers than their male counterparts. Women are known to be underrepresented in the medical sciences, but even accounting for this an AI-tool revealed that female authors featured on far fewer retracted research articles. Reporter Jenna Ahart has been investigating and told us why this might be, and what it means for research more broadly.Nature:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03796-w" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Women seem to retract fewer papers than men — but why?</a><a href="https://www.nature.com/briefing/signup" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Subscribe to Nature Briefing, an unmissable daily round-up of science news, opinion and analysis free in your inbox every weekday.</a><hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

This is what lightning on Mars sounds like

Nature Podcast

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews