This episode is a part of<a href="https://slate.com/tag/opinionpalooza"> Opinionpalooza</a>. Slate’s coverage of Supreme Court decisions. We consider this coverage so essential that we’re taking down the paywall for all of it. If you would like to help us continue to cover the courts aggressively, please consider<a href="https://slate.com/amicusplus"> joining Slate Plus</a>. And<a href="https://slate.com/_pages/clidcx5kl000hgsma2w2y3u93.html?"> sign up for the pop-up newsletter</a> to see the latest every week in your inbox.In deciding against the bonkers (technical legal term) “Independent State Legislature Theory” in Moore v Harper, the Supreme Court chose not to take a wrecking ball to American democracy. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/25/opinion/trump-republican-party.html">Judge Michael Luttig</a>, a counsel of record in the case, is relieved but not surprised. In this emergency episode of Amicus, Judge Luttig tells Dahlia Lithwick that Tuesday’s decision may have big repercussions at the Department of Justice, in Jack Smith’s investigation of former President Trump’s role in January 6th.<a href="https://my.slate.com/plus?utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=plus_pod&utm_content=Amicus&utm_source=show_notes">Sign up for Slate Plus</a> now to support our show. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit <a href="https://megaphone.fm/adchoices">megaphone.fm/adchoices</a>

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

Amicus: Moore v Harper Was a Win for Democracy, A Big Loss For Donald Trump

Slate News

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews