Brought to you by Trade Coffee! Get up to 3 bags free with any new Trade subscription at <a href= "https://drinktrade.com/OA">drinktrade.com/OA</a> OA 1128 - First: an urgent question from a patron on Trump’s latest executive power grab. Matt explains the history of the “unitary executive theory” and the Federalist Society-backed movement to give the President more power than an actual king.  Then: Rutgers Law professor Katie Eyer studies, teaches, and litigates the law of anti-discrimination with a specialty in LGBTQ rights. She joins to discuss the current state of the law in the shadow of the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti and the wake of Donald Trump’s recent anti-trans executive orders. Which, if any, of these orders should we actually be concerned about? What does it mean that the fight for trans lives is now becoming a federal issue?  Can Trump really just instruct the federal government to ignore the Supreme Court’s extension of employment protections to LGBTQ employees in Bostock v. Clayton County? Professor Eyer takes up these questions and many more as we find reasons both for concern and for hope. <ul> <li> “<a href= "https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/ensuring-accountability-for-all-agencies/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies</a>,” (2/18/25) </li> <li> <a href= "https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/01/Birk-73-Stan.-L.-Rev.-175.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">“Interrogating the Historical Basis for a Unitary Executive,” Daniel D. Birke, Stanford Law Review (Jan. 2021)</a> </li> <li> <a href="https://law.rutgers.edu/bio/kre22" rel= "noopener noreferrer nofollow">Professor Katie Eyer</a> (Rutgers Law bio) </li> <li> <a href= "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4627458" rel= "noopener noreferrer nofollow">Anti-Transgender Constitutional Law</a>, 77 Vanderbilt L. Rev. __ (2024) (forthcoming) </li> <li> <a href= "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4173202" rel= "noopener noreferrer nofollow">Transgender Constitutional Law,</a> 171 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1405 (2023) </li> <li> <a href= "https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/590us2r44_6kgn.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Bostock v. Clayton County</a>, 590 US ___ (2020) </li> </ul> Check out the OA <a href= "https://linktr.ee/openingarguments">Linktree</a> for all the places to go and things to do! To support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at <a href= "https://patreon.com/law"></a><a href= "http://patreon.com/law">patreon.com/law</a>!

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

We Have a King Now I Guess. Cool. Cool.

Opening Arguments

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews