OA1284 - Can a modern court implement modern solutions? It really depends on your perspective. Despite some baffling misconceptions about how… anything works, the Justices seem to be doing a pretty good job of ultimately deciding that yes, police do in fact need a warrant to deeply invade your digital privacy. While Kavanaugh appears to have the entire concept of data storage and search queries upside down and backwards, Gorsuch asks complex questions about metadata versus true content, how data is stored in individual accounts, and what other types of data would be exposed if police were allowed to search your location information without a warrant… and yet they both ultimately vote to protect your privacy. It’s a weird world out there folks. Cases discussed: <ul> <li> <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/565/400/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">United States v. Jones</a> </li> <li> <a href= "https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/585/16-402/" target= "_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Carpenter v. United States</a> </li> <li> <a href= "https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/609/25-112/" target= "_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Chatrie v. United States</a> </li> </ul> Check out the OA <a href= "https://linktr.ee/openingarguments" target="_blank" rel= "noopener noreferrer nofollow">Linktree</a> for all the places to go and things to do!

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

How a Bank Robbery Became a Fourth Amendment Landmark

Opening Arguments

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews