A critical gun case was argued before the Supreme Court this week. But instead of opening further freedoms for gun owners — as the court, with its conservative supermajority, did in a blockbuster decision last year — justices seemed ready to rule that the government may disarm people under restraining orders for domestic violence.Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The Times, explains why.Guest: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/by/adam-liptak?smid=pc-thedaily">Adam Liptak</a>, who covers the Supreme Court for The New York Times and writes Sidebar, a column on legal developments.Background reading: <ul><li>The Supreme Court<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/07/us/politics/supreme-court-gun-rights-domestic-violence.html?smid=pc-thedaily"> seemed likely to uphold a law</a> disarming domestic abusers.</li><li>But a decision on the case<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/11/07/us/supreme-court-guns-domestic-violence#rahimi-supreme-court-gun-case?smid=pc-thedaily"> is not expected until June</a>.</li><li><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/11/07/us/supreme-court-guns-domestic-violence#supreme-court-guns?smid=pc-thedaily">What has the Supreme Court said on guns?</a></li></ul>For more information on today’s episode, visit <a href="http://nytimes.com/thedaily?smid=pc-thedaily">nytimes.com/thedaily</a>. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

Podurama

Home

Trending

Personal

Your Podcasts

New Episodes

My Files

Favourite Episodes

Tags (Folders)

Recently Played

Bookmarks

Followed Playlists

The Supreme Court Tests Its Own Limits on Guns

The Daily

AI Chapters

AI Insights

Reviews